Legal · Reputation·Crescendo case study · Midtown East, New York, NY

Reputation intelligence for a Manhattan litigation boutique.

Built a custom AI reputation audit for Kessler & Vann LLP — pulls reviews across 8 platforms, runs sentiment and theme analysis, drafts responses in the managing partner's voice, and produces a single-page weekly action plan. Turned a 15-hour-per-week manual chore into a 92-second automated process.

5-star review rate
+40%
55% → 77% in 11 weeks across all platforms
Partner time saved
15 hrs
Per week, across monitoring, drafting, and reporting
Reputation health score
89
Up from 62 — now leads peer set
See how the audit runs
Before · the state of play

Reviews were everywhere and nothing was happening to them.

When we started with Kessler & Vann LLP in early February, they had 300 reviews scattered across 8 platforms. The managing partner tried to stay on top of them manually. Three platforms hadn't received a single response in over a year. The weekly “how are we doing?” partner meeting was vibes, not data.

300
Reviews across all sources
Last 24 months
21%
Response rate (weighted)
3 platforms completely untouched
~17 hrs
Weekly manual effort
Monitoring, drafting, reporting — split between RK and her paralegal
Platform inventory — pre-audit
PlatformReviewsAvg ★Response rate
Google Business
1484.431%
Avvo
524.719%
Martindale-Hubbell
174.86%
Yelp
233.99%
Justia
144.60%
Lawyers.com
94.30%
LinkedIn recs
314.916%
Super Lawyers
65.00%
The audit · 92 seconds end-to-end

Watch it run once.

Scroll into view to trigger. This is the exact sequence that runs in production every Sunday night at 11pm, so the managing partner's Monday-morning email already has answers.

Step 1
Pull reviews from every platform
Step 2
Classify sentiment across 291 reviews
Step 3
Extract themes and specific complaints
Step 4
Draft responses in the partner's voice
Step 5
Ship the weekly action plan
crescendo-audit · kessler-vann · 2026-10-22
01
Pulling reviews
Google Business
0
reviews
Avvo
0
reviews
Martindale-Hubbell
0
reviews
Yelp
0
reviews
Justia
0
reviews
Lawyers.com
0
reviews
LinkedIn recs
0
reviews
Super Lawyers
0
reviews
Reviews ingested…
After · 11 weeks in

The boring part: every number moved up.

Reputation health score

62 → 89, no gimmicks

Weighted composite of review volume, star distribution, response rate, recency, and sentiment across all 8 platforms. Crescendo engagement begins at Kickoff.

Response rate

From 21% to 95% in six weeks

Of every review left in the last 30 days, 95% now have a partner-approved response live within 48 hours. Drafts generated nightly; partner approves in batch on Monday.

Star distribution

5-star rate · before & after

Rate of 5-star reviews grew because (a) the firm proactively asked satisfied clients at discharge, and (b) dormant 4-star reviewers were re-engaged with personalized follow-ups.

Before
5★
55%
4★
21%
3★
10%
2★
7%
1★
7%
After
5★
77%
4★
14%
3★
4%
2★
3%
1★
2%
New-client inquiries

11 → 32 weekly inquiries

Direct inbound via firm website, Google profile, and phone. Not attributed 100% to reputation work, but the acceleration aligns with response-rate catching up.

Recommendations · what the system actually suggested

Not insights. Actions.

The audit's output isn't a 40-page PDF that no one reads. It's three specific things to do this week, with the work already drafted. Here are the recommendations from week 4 of the engagement.

01
Theme · Responsiveness
mixed signal · 142 mentions
What reviewers are saying

“Rachel returned every call within 24 hours and her paralegal Nina was phenomenal — but two emails to the junior associate went unanswered for a week.”

Recommendation

Institute 24-hour client email SLA firm-wide. Auto-acknowledgement template drafted.

02
Theme · Outcomes & results
positive signal · 118 mentions
What reviewers are saying

“Walked in thinking we'd lose at least something. Kessler's team got a full dismissal in under 90 days.”

Recommendation

Surface 3 strongest outcome stories on the website in a case-study format.

03
Theme · Billing clarity
negative signal · 63 mentions
What reviewers are saying

“Excellent lawyers but the bills came with 47 line items and no context. Took 3 rounds of emails to understand a single invoice.”

Recommendation

Redesign invoice template with narrative summary + line items. Mock approved by managing partner.

Return on spend · year one

The math, plainly.

Annual P&L impact
Partner + paralegal hours saved
15 hrs/week × 52 weeks
780 hrs
Value of recovered partner time
@ $225/hr blended
$175,500
Incremental client inquiries
21 more/month × 12
+252
New matters
@ 18% inquiry-to-matter conversion
+45
Incremental matter revenue
@ $42,000 average matter fee
$1,890,000
Crescendo retainer
$6,400/month × 12
−$76,800
Net annual value created
before any downstream referral effects
$1,988,700
Payback
0.4 mo

The retainer pays for itself in recovered partner hours alone, before counting a single incremental matter.

What it replaces
  • Reputation management SaaS$1,200/mo
  • Review monitoring tool$400/mo
  • Agency-drafted responses$1,800/mo
  • Manual partner time17 hrs/wk

Replaced all of the above. Still custom to K&V's voice.

“We used to wake up on Monday and just hope nothing was on fire. Now the audit runs over the weekend, we get a single page on Monday morning that says exactly what to do, and the drafted responses are 90% of the way there. The five-star rate moving from 55 to 77 percent paid for the engagement in the first month.”
RK
Rachel Kessler
Managing Partner · Kessler & Vann LLP
Want this for your firm?

Your reputation is already being read. The question is whether you're reading it back.

30-minute call. I'll run an audit on your firm live on the call — you'll see the output by the end of it. No pitch deck.

92s
audit run time
8
platforms covered
2 wk
typical time to measurable lift